Provide a brief summary of the article (what was addressed and what were the results)?
How is the information relevant to your knowledge of human growth and development (what did you learn from the article)?
Identify a source of strength of the article (something that was addressed that highlighted an important/significant point for you or something that you liked about the article)?
What would you have liked for the article to address that perhaps was not (could it have benefited from using a larger number of participants, were the trials not rigorous enough, etc.)? You must address an issue in this area, and not simply say that there is nothing that the researchers could have done differently.
Include a title page and a reference page that adheres to APA style.  Include each of the following areas, as well as your responses.