Explain the case, identifying the elements that are morally relevant and explaining why they are relevant.

Explain the Foxconn case, identifying the elements that are morally relevant and explaining why they are relevant.
Provide an analysis of the case from two different theoretical perspectives. For example, you might explain how a utilitarian would approach the case versus how a Kantian would approach the case.
Critically evaluate the two perspectives, identifying the strengths and weaknesses.
It is not necessary that you draw a conclusion about which perspective is correct, but you are welcome to do so, especially if in doing so, you demonstrate your understanding of course material.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *